Imaginary, Illusion and Liberals

There is a big difference between imaginary and illusion. On the surface they seem the same, as both represent something other than reality. However down below the surface, where one begins to comprehend the mutually exclusive concepts each word defines, one may, if matured, consciously perceive the difference. For those adults who have chosen to remain immature, there is, undoubtedly, good reason to keep oneself and others from distinguishing the difference between the two.

In imaginary perception one is filling the void of a necessity that reality has inadvertently shortchanged. A child, living in seclusion, in need of other children for all manner of social contact, will create imaginary friends to fill this need, which reality has not.

A man or a woman in waiting for their soul mate or heart of hearts will fill the absence in reality of their need with the imagination of being with or finally meeting their intended other half.

The great Albert Einstein utilized imagination in his famous “thought experiments” to do for his scientific quest what reality could not, and all that to understand what the reality of reality was.

Does not he or she pursuing their superiority, in any field of endeavor, and from time to time, imagine the moment they achieve their said superiority? Does not this imagination help those in pursuit of their superiority to one day achieve their superiority?

Imagination, for all its apparent falseness, is in fact, rooted in reality. It deals with reality even though reality is unable to cooperate at the particular time.

Illusion seems on the surface to be the same as imagination, as it too reflects a something that is not reality. However, the falseness illusion reflects is intended to replace reality, not to ever be one with reality.

Where imagination is an aid to reality, illusion is a usurper of reality. Further, it does seem clear that though everyone can and may utilize imagination, only a particular type of personality will use illusion. Illusion is reserved for those who deny reality, and those who deny reality are the immature.

It should also be clear, that those who deny reality, the immature, adopt the ideology of liberalism and hence become liberals.

Take for example a white liberal who never hurdled the obstacle of cowardice. When presented with the situation that elicits his or her cowardice, how can the immature liberal not suffer the chastisement of his peers or society for his or her failure to mature?

This liberal coward, Jimmy Carter, as President he 

let the Shah and Iran be taken by the

Ayatollah and Islam. Now Iran pursues the bomb.

In the game of social chess the liberal can feign noble courage by both befriending those he is cowardly afraid and by confronting his own people whom he fears not, and all on the false pretensions of morality. Here the immature liberal looks courageous, hides his cowardice and ultimately the price tag affixed to this cheat is subsequently paid for by the collective of his own people.

The white liberals who defend Islam or Negros, because of their cowardice elicited by Islam or the Negros, looks good while he stands tall with false noble courage, but the collective suffers as Islam or the Negros then run slipshod over the white culture and white people.

This liberal coward, Ted Kennedy, transmogrified

America's demographics, which in turn

transmogrified America.

Sir Winston Churchill once stated, “those who appease the crocodile, hope to be the last eaten”. This is the coward’s strategy, where illusion is offered up as reality, and further is defended via the game of social chess. Here instead of the immature liberal bearing his own burden, the price of his cowardice personally, the collective bears said burden as those invaders/aggressors gain in their pursuit to conquer or parasitize the culture.

Winston Churchill, a great man, a great leader

and therefore not a liberal; the man had class.

Nobody can cure a liberal but the liberal himself. The liberal can “cure” himself by embracing his personal responsibility to mature, and this by the way, is the task nature charges all humans with.

Unfortunately for us non-liberal whites, we are burdened by white liberals from our own gene pool/race, as they forge or unite together, and further, embrace our enemies in a feigned friendship of losers, hoping to skirt their failure to mature and its accompanying embarrassment at the expense of both our white culture and our mutual white gene pool/race. This strategy is currently operating in the white world of the West, and has been for the last half century or so, and is destroying and/or transmogrifying our successful gene pool/race and cultures into a loser gene pool/race and cultures.

This liberal coward, Janet Napolitano,

refuses to protect America's borders.

Moreover, I have come to realize that liberals in defense and promotion of their liberal illusion will cherry pick the facts of reality which in turn naturally or logically deduce their targeted conclusion of illusion. If there are no facts to cherry pick, liberals will create the needed “facts” from whole cloth.

Liberalism is immaturity. Immaturity denies reality and substitutes a preferred illusion in said reality’s stead.

Imagination works for, and is further, for all people; illusion only works for, and further, is only for, the immature. In our adult world, the immature are the liberals. Thank you.